Post by spilledchemicals on Dec 8, 2007 22:57:56 GMT -5
OK, so, with pyrokinesis, the way I keep seeing it being described is that you increase the temperature with psi. I have done this on my own, measured by a thermometer for scientific proof. (I remove as many variables as possible, so psi is the only reasonable explanation.) Now, the next question which must be asked is, how?
Well, lets start with basic physics. The colder something is, the less the molecules vibrate, the denser it is. Under normal atmospheric pressure water, at room temperature, is liquid, at 0o Celsius or below, is a solid, and at 100o Celsius or above is a gas. All elements and compounds are bound to the rule of being solids, liquids, and gasses at different temperatures, though their respective temperatures will be different.
This is because the more heat (energy) there is, the more particles are aroused, and so they are more apt to move. So, logically, at near absolute 0, –273.15oC everything should be a solid, but its not. He-3 and He-4 are still liquids (unless put at 26 times normal atmospheric conditions). Why is that? It is something called 0 point energy, where, when there is no place to provide energy, atoms still have the energy from their nuclear forces.
But where does this energy come from? Well, atoms are made of protons, neutrons, and electrons, which are made of quarks. And all of these are considered matter. But when you look into a quark, you find that there is nothing to it. Literally, quarks are not made of matter. There are many theories to what quarks are made of, such as non-three dimensional preons. This opens a Pandora's box of possibilities, but I think the simplest answer is the best. I think that this is where Einstein's simple E=mc2 comes into play, where energy becomes mass.
And what is psi if not energy?
So, in this thought process you are controlling the building blocks of all matter. And in pyrokinesis, you are just generally making the foundation shake, making the whole molecule shake, increasing vibration, and therefore heat.
Now, if this is the way it works, I propose a better way to do pyrokinesis, though I, and none I know, is yet powerful enough to do this. Take pure water, H2O, and by vibrating each atom at a different rate, separate the molecule into 2H, O. These are very reactive to each other, if given the correct amount of heat.
And what is this article about? Heat. So, when they react, there are intense heat, flame, and water as the byproducts. Water in the form of steam. Does anyone see where I'm going with this? Steam floats in air, and if you constantly do this to a small amount of water, then you could suspend fire in the air indefinitely.
Now that last bit was highly theoretical, as my energy reserves, as well as willpower, aren't enough, at this moment, to do so.
That's my thoughts on the subject.
Well, lets start with basic physics. The colder something is, the less the molecules vibrate, the denser it is. Under normal atmospheric pressure water, at room temperature, is liquid, at 0o Celsius or below, is a solid, and at 100o Celsius or above is a gas. All elements and compounds are bound to the rule of being solids, liquids, and gasses at different temperatures, though their respective temperatures will be different.
This is because the more heat (energy) there is, the more particles are aroused, and so they are more apt to move. So, logically, at near absolute 0, –273.15oC everything should be a solid, but its not. He-3 and He-4 are still liquids (unless put at 26 times normal atmospheric conditions). Why is that? It is something called 0 point energy, where, when there is no place to provide energy, atoms still have the energy from their nuclear forces.
But where does this energy come from? Well, atoms are made of protons, neutrons, and electrons, which are made of quarks. And all of these are considered matter. But when you look into a quark, you find that there is nothing to it. Literally, quarks are not made of matter. There are many theories to what quarks are made of, such as non-three dimensional preons. This opens a Pandora's box of possibilities, but I think the simplest answer is the best. I think that this is where Einstein's simple E=mc2 comes into play, where energy becomes mass.
And what is psi if not energy?
So, in this thought process you are controlling the building blocks of all matter. And in pyrokinesis, you are just generally making the foundation shake, making the whole molecule shake, increasing vibration, and therefore heat.
Now, if this is the way it works, I propose a better way to do pyrokinesis, though I, and none I know, is yet powerful enough to do this. Take pure water, H2O, and by vibrating each atom at a different rate, separate the molecule into 2H, O. These are very reactive to each other, if given the correct amount of heat.
And what is this article about? Heat. So, when they react, there are intense heat, flame, and water as the byproducts. Water in the form of steam. Does anyone see where I'm going with this? Steam floats in air, and if you constantly do this to a small amount of water, then you could suspend fire in the air indefinitely.
Now that last bit was highly theoretical, as my energy reserves, as well as willpower, aren't enough, at this moment, to do so.
That's my thoughts on the subject.