|
Post by neopsychic on Oct 31, 2007 23:29:10 GMT -5
It's not like routers today don't have a firewall. A routers firewall usally works by blocking things you add to them. Unless you install different software/hardware. Peergaurdian2 and protowall work backwords. It blocks a lot of stuff, then you choose who can "come in" to your comp. PS. Yayz for Karen, hope that worked. Maybe now you learned why you shouldn't visit those pr0n sites
|
|
odbod
Psion Explorer
are?my
Posts: 158
|
Post by odbod on Nov 1, 2007 0:35:59 GMT -5
Router firewalls work by preventing anything from coming in, UNLESS you tell it otherwise. (port forwarding, DMZ, etc)
|
|
|
Post by neopsychic on Nov 1, 2007 17:12:20 GMT -5
Router firewalls work by preventing anything from coming in, UNLESS you tell it otherwise. (port forwarding, DMZ, etc) Read up on things about firewalls and routers. Took me an hour *grumble*. I was probably talking about what's known as IPSEC part of firewalls. What the heck was I thinking? Oh well. Heres something I found that tells the difference between IPSEC and firewalls. "2.6 Will IPSEC make firewalls obsolete? Some have argued that this is the case. Before pronouncing such a sweeping prediction, however, it's worthwhile to consider what IPSEC is and what it does. Once we know this, we can consider whether IPSEC will solve the problems that we're trying to solve with firewalls. IPSEC (IP SECurity) refers to a set of standards developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). There are many documents that collectively define what is known as ``IPSEC'' [4]. IPSEC solves two problems which have plagued the IP protocol suite for years: host-to-host authentication (which will let hosts know that they're talking to the hosts they think they are) and encryption (which will prevent attackers from being able to watch the traffic going between machines). Note that neither of these problems is what firewalls were created to solve. Although firewalls can help to mitigate some of the risks present on an Internet without authentication or encryption, there are really two classes of problems here: integrity and privacy of the information flowing between hosts and the limits placed on what kinds of connectivity is allowed between different networks. IPSEC addresses the former class and firewalls the latter. What this means is that one will not eliminate the need for the other, but it does create some interesting possibilities when we look at combining firewalls with IPSEC-enabled hosts. Namely, such things as vendor-independent virtual private networks (VPNs), better packet filtering (by filtering on whether packets have the IPSEC authentication header), and application-layer firewalls will be able to have better means of host verification by actually using the IPSEC authentication header instead of ``just trusting'' the IP address presented."
|
|
|
Post by The Adfeng on Nov 1, 2007 20:01:53 GMT -5
Wireless Routers DO have fire walls, but sometimes people don't use them to their full advantage. I use wireless internet in my house, and don't have it secure, for a couple reasons, but I know I should. There isn't anyone around here that has a computer, and I don't share printers, music, or anything like that, it's just pure internet connection. And plus, my computer has a built in firewall, plus AVG, plus Norton, plus Windows Defender, so I'm kinda safe, but you can never be too safe. I'm going to see about trying to figure out the password for this dang-ed thing, because I got it from one of my former principals, he didn't have laptop any more, so he gave it to me. It's a linksys, and it connects at about 100mbps. Not bad.
Viruses are bad and hard to remove, especially if it gets so far as making Zlob files, which are made in the registry. Basicly, if you delete the program, it's still there. Even a system restore won't get rid of it, you have to get rid of it manually. Which is why you should NEVER download anything like "SpyLocked" or something that looks similar to it's website. It's a rouge anti-spyware, and it's very harmful, and very hard to remove, and it took me almost 3 hours to be able to use the internet(it basicly makes all of your sites broken, and will set your homepage to it's page). Got kind of annoying, got a program to remove it, and it did.
What I'm trying to say is, anything out there can be a virus, just like goggle(do not go there), it puts a virus in your computer if you stay on the site for more than 43 seconds. If anyone has any questions on if a program is safe, or if your computer is acting up, I'll be here.
And it's nice to hear, JK, that you got your computer fixed. AVG is better than Norton in my opinion, because it doesn't take up 1,000,000,000 computer usage.
|
|
Darin Rosewood
Experienced Psion
What? MY address? MY phone number? I HAVE NO TONGUE WHICH COULD UTTER SUCH TO ONE AS MENIAL AS YOU!
Posts: 436
|
Post by Darin Rosewood on Nov 2, 2007 12:39:32 GMT -5
Alright, now that that problem's fixed, anyone want to try to help me out on mine? Basically, I've been unable to access certain sites from this computer (astralsociety.com and gamereplays.org being a few of them), while I can on basically any other computer. I could access them from this computer before, but then the sites suddenly quit on me without warning. I hadn't been messing with my computer before it happened on each of the sites it did, so I really can't figure out what's wrong. Using a different browser makes no difference. I can't even ping or telnet the sites using the command prompt. My firewall/router isn't blocking them, as I can still access them from any other computer in the house. I'm running Windows XP. I really have no idea why it's doing this, and I haven't been able to find an answer so far. Maybe some of you guys could help, I dunno. I'd really appreciate it and probably give you karma as many times as I can over the next two weeks if you can help me out. ^_^
|
|
Amodia
Experienced Psion
That's me you're looking at.
Posts: 419
|
Post by Amodia on Nov 2, 2007 13:32:46 GMT -5
You know, it's not good to have more then one active anti-virus program, for example; Norton A-V, F-Secure, AVG A-V. They block each other making each other run with defectly.
|
|
odbod
Psion Explorer
are?my
Posts: 158
|
Post by odbod on Nov 3, 2007 0:49:04 GMT -5
Darin, have you checked your browser settings possibly?
|
|
Darin Rosewood
Experienced Psion
What? MY address? MY phone number? I HAVE NO TONGUE WHICH COULD UTTER SUCH TO ONE AS MENIAL AS YOU!
Posts: 436
|
Post by Darin Rosewood on Nov 5, 2007 22:15:42 GMT -5
Already said it had nothing to do with the browser. If it did, I'd still be able to ping, telnet and tracert the sites, but it's as if they don't exist at all on my computer.
|
|
Apollo
Experienced Psion
Posts: 287
|
Post by Apollo on Nov 15, 2007 21:59:54 GMT -5
Haha. These worms are really fun to make and they freak the darn out of people :-)
|
|
|
Post by JediKaren on Nov 15, 2007 22:13:36 GMT -5
apollo don't ever say that again. You really haven't learned a thing have you?
|
|
odbod
Psion Explorer
are?my
Posts: 158
|
Post by odbod on Nov 16, 2007 2:21:40 GMT -5
Some worms were made to annoy you, some worms are actually destructive. An example of an annoyance was to duplicate tons of times to fill up your hard drive to it's cap. A destructive is this:
I got a svehost.exe file that added itself to startup, added registry to make sure it stayed. it made a folder called shellext, and duplicated itself as names to serials to programs(serials and cracks are illegal!!) and some inappropriate sites, but they were all the same svehost file. Luckily, I stopped it before it deleted task manager and msconfig.
I got the worm from going to a site trying to downloading from a mirror of spybot.
|
|